🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? You should be. Who comprehends this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average employee. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – appears to require demands advanced expertise in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Is More Than Complicated, It's Costly

Based on recent research, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $17,000 per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning due to political disagreements regarding subsidies that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I have to believe we're getting closer since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an insurance system – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How our healthcare providers get paid would change. Trust me, they'll adapt.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would require contributions from employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker making moderate income must contribute approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer must contribute about 13.75%.

Does this seem like a lot? Not if you contrast that with what the typical American pays. I know dozens of businesses that are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that with comprehensive systems, those payments include pension plans, illness coverage, maternity leave and unemployment benefits along with funding medical services. When you add those costs versus what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Execution for America

For America, a national health premium would raise existing Medicare taxes, a system that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both worker and employer contribution. And, like much of federal defense, technology, social programs and infrastructure, the system should be outsourced to third-party administrators instead of federal agencies.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage would be a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would make administration significantly simpler (a payroll deduction remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would make it easier for us to budget annual expenditures, instead of enduring the complicated (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would exist a better understanding of coverage by our employees – as opposed to the current system which require them to decipher the complexities of current options. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' medical records for purposes of weighing risks and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. But I've learned that government has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare to all via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs that employ the majority of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It enables employees to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act is not working effectively. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, despite increased taxation that would be incurred, would remain a superior and less expensive strategy both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must reduce national pride. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, based on comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot amid present circumstances is that we take a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.